Loading...
Loading...
British soldiers fired into a Boston crowd and killed five colonists; Patriot propaganda turned the street fight into a rallying cry.
Where this fits on the timeline. Five years after the Stamp Act and three years before the Boston Tea Party, the quarrel between Britain and its colonies turned deadly on a snowy Boston street. On the night of March 5, 1770, British soldiers fired into a crowd and killed five people. Patriots named it a massacre, printed pictures of it, and marked its anniversary every year until the war came. It is a key scene in the American Revolution and the first time colonists died at the hands of the king's troops.
The troops came to collect taxes. Boston had led the resistance to the Townshend duties of 1767, and its customs officers were being threatened. In 1768 Britain sent two regiments, about 2,000 soldiers, into a town of 16,000 people. Soldiers were quartered in public buildings, competed with laborers for off-duty jobs, and traded insults with townspeople daily. To Bostonians the redcoats were proof that Parliament would enforce its taxes by force, exactly the danger Samuel Adams had been warning about.
A lone sentry, a crowd, and a volley nobody ordered. A wig-maker's apprentice taunted a British officer outside the Custom House on King Street, and the sentry on duty struck him. A crowd gathered, church bells rang, and the mob grew to several hundred, throwing snowballs, ice, oyster shells, and sticks. Captain Thomas Preston brought seven soldiers to rescue the sentry. Someone knocked a soldier down; he fired; others followed. When the smoke cleared, three men were dead in the street and two more died later. Among them was Crispus Attucks, a sailor of African and Native descent, remembered as the first to fall. Preston insisted he never gave the order to fire, and the evidence supports him.
The soldiers got a fair trial, and a Patriot lawyer gave it to them. John Adams agreed to defend Preston and the soldiers, arguing that even unpopular men deserved justice and that the crowd had provoked the shooting. Preston was acquitted. Six soldiers were acquitted, and two were convicted of manslaughter and branded on the thumb instead of hanged. Adams later called it one of the best actions of his life. The verdict also mattered politically: it showed that colonial courts could be fair even in the middle of a crisis.
Paul Revere sold the story before the trial began. Within weeks, Revere published an engraving, copied from a drawing by Henry Pelham, that showed a line of grinning soldiers firing on command into a peaceful crowd. It was propaganda, not reporting, and it worked. Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty organized annual Massacre Day orations that kept the memory alive, and Britain withdrew the troops from the town to Castle Island. When the crisis returned with the Tea Act, Boston already had its martyrs. Compare it with the fighting at Lexington and Concord five years later, when the colonists fired back.
Start with the primary sources. The Massachusetts Historical Society has Revere's engraving, trial testimony, and the depositions gathered on both sides. Britannica gives a short overview. Serena Zabin's The Boston Massacre: A Family History tells the story through the soldiers' families who lived among the townspeople.
Recommended, age-appropriate books to explore this further. Links open a library catalog search.
The Boston Massacre: A Family History
by Serena Zabin
Tells the story through the soldiers and their families who lived among Bostonians; for grades 9 to 12.
King George: What Was His Problem?
by Steve Sheinkin
A funny, accurate account of the whole Revolution that starts with scenes like this one; a great fit for grades 6 to 8.
British troops had occupied Boston since 1768 to enforce the Townshend taxes
Five colonists died, including Crispus Attucks; Captain Preston almost certainly never ordered the volley
John Adams defended the soldiers and won acquittals, showing colonial courts could be fair
Paul Revere's engraving and yearly Massacre Day speeches turned the event into a symbol of British tyranny